Moral Assessment

+

Abhorrent

+ +

Disturbing

+ + +

Acceptable

+ + + +

Wholesome

+ + + + +

Exemplary

Technical Assessment

Poor

• •

Below average

• • •

Average

• • • •

Above average

• • • • •

Excellent

CINEMA Rating Guide

VA

For viewers of all ages

V13

For viewers age 13 and below with parental guidance

V14

For viewers 14 and above

V18

For mature viewers 18 and above

NP

Not for public viewing

 

Title:

INTERNET QUEEN

Running Time: 

80 min.

Lead Cast:

Daniel Baldwin, Coolio, Alex McArthur, Jenya Lano, Darrel Dubovsky, Julie St. Claire

Director: 

Mark Lester

Producers:

Peter Jay Klauser, Joseph de Pompell, Martin J. Barab

Screenwriters:

Randall Frakes, C. Courtney Joyner

Music:

 

Editor: 

Donn Aron

Genre:

Sex/Action

Cinematography: 

 

Distributor:

American World Pictures

Location: 

USA

Technical Assessment: 

• •

Moral Assessment: 

+ +

CINEMA Rating:  

For mature viewers 18 and above

 

Famous actress Candy Tyler (Jenya Lano) who excites the audience with her lustful portrayal in her movies considers herself a prudent person in real life.  However, Fred Dawd (Alex McArthur) who monitors her every action thinks otherwise.  He solicits the assistance of convict-on-parole Brad Vorman (Coolio) and computer hacker Walt Gearson (Daniel Baldwin) who desperately needs money for his child's hospital treatment and other financial needs; together they kidnap Candy and make her do a porn movie to be shown on the internet for one night only. Candy, knowing that her father is in grave danger, if she doesn't agree, succumbs to have sex on the Internet. The twist to the plan is that Brad is so envious, that he wants the whole deal: the money, and even Candy. He's ready to kill everyone else, including Candy if need be.

The plot is so thin and simple that foolish scenes are inserted to fill up the void. Except for the role of Daniel Baldwin about a conscientious father in desperate need of cash to pay for the operation of his son, there is no other character development, aside from that showing pure greed by the characters.  There is not even a hint of how the characters have become so obsessed with money in the first place.  This looks like a low budget film, all the other technical and artistic aspects are done too simplistically: there are few actors, few scenes, sparing development in music and effects, etc.  For its climax, the filmmaker has resorted to the age-old chase between the pursuer and the pursued.  Worse, an unexpected twist at the end appears to be a desperate attempt to tie up the loose ends and probably help save this movie.

There is "more" to promoting this film than the technical, artistic, story and other usual qualities; and that is that it is "erotic."  The filmmakers may have unleashed onto screen the dangerous adage which people should not espouse in any way, and that is: "Crime pays."  One could set up a system of crime, carry it out, and even get away with it.  Sugarcoat it with a philanthropic act, and it may appear noble and godly.  But this does not sanitize the filth of the criminal act.  Learn from another saying: "The end does not justify the means!" The audience should know by now that movies are neither just for entertainment, nor should they watch it simply because it is "erotic" or "bold".  People who are insensitive to every decent moral value, be it human or divine, may be easily swayed by films like this.  Which presumably cause a lot of crimes in this country and in others as well!  Unless the adult audiences claim that they are really mature they should do well to ignore films like this.

 

(Date Reviewed: December 11, 2003)

 

HOMEABOUT USNEWSPROGRAMSDOCUMENTSMOVIE REVIEWSARCHIVES
RATINGSCALENDARPHOTO GALLERYCONTACT USPRIVACY POLICY | LINKS